Shakespeares Major Theme in King Lear - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1427 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2019/07/30 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: King Lear Essay William Shakespeare Essay Did you like this example? Compassion in Tragedy: Shakespeares Major Theme in King Lear Albert Schweitzer once said that The purpose of human life is to serve, and to show compassion and the will to help others. Compassion is feeling sympathy, being kind, and caring for others. In William Shakespeares play King Lear, an important theme is that its important to show kindness to others, even in difficult times. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Shakespeares Major Theme in King Lear" essay for you Create order Shakespeare demonstrates this theme through King Lears conversations with his daughters, especially the youngest, Cordelia, and his conversations with his friends. King Lear follows the story of an aging king and his daughters as he gives up his throne. The majority of the play focuses on Lears descent into madness at the cruel hands of his daughters Regan and Goneril, and concludes with their death and Lears reconciliation with his other daughter Cordelia. Along the way, Lears interactions with his friends and daughters show the audience the power of compassion. King Lears daughters are a primary example of Shakespeares demonstration of this theme. Very early in the play, after Lear has divvied his kingdom up between his daughters, his noble advisor Kent attempts to persuade Lear that hes judged his youngest daughter Cordelias love too harshly. Answer my life my judgement, thy youngest daughter does not love thee least, nor are those empty-hearted whose low sound reverbs no hollowness. (I, i, ll. 151-153). After the false, flattering words from his daughters Goneril and Regan, Lears inability to see that Cordelias love was too great to be put into words caused him to lose his daughter and his advisor Kent, who was exiled when his compassion caused Lear to become furious at him. Kent knows his attempt to show the king how to fix his relationship with honesty and compassion will cost him his title, his status and Lears trust, yet he does it anyway. Eventually, Lear tries to mend the rift hes caused with Cordelia. Be your tears wet? Yes, faith. I pray, weep not. If you have poison for me, I will drink it. I know you do not love me, for your sisters have, as I do remember, done me wrong. You have some cause; they have not, King Lear says in Act 4, Scene 7 in lines 69 to 73 as he apologizes to Cordelia when he realizes he was wrong and misjudged her. Cordelias response, No cause, no cause, (IV, vii, ll. 74) shows her continued love for her father, as is also demonstrated in Act 4, Scene 3, lines 25-30 Faith, once or twice she heaved the name of father pantingly forth as if it pressed her heart, cried sisters, sisters! Shame of ladies, sisters! Kent, father, sisters! What, i th storm, i th night? Let pity not be believed. There she shook the holy water from her heavenly eyes, and clamor moistened. Then away she started to deal with grief alone. Despite being banished by her father, she still loves him and grieves for him. Her love resonates throughout the story and she is the only character to stand by Lear after he has lost everything his crown, his mind, and his cruel, oldest daughters. Regan is one of those cruel older daughters, and very early on in the story she shows the audience her cold heart. Shut up your doors: he is attended by a desperate train, and what they may to incense him to, being apt to have his ear abused, wisdom bids fear. (II, iv, ll. 348-351). Her husband Cornwall responds with Shut up your doors, my lord. Tis a wild night. My Regan counsels well. Come out o th storm. (II, iv, ll. 351-353). Not only does Regan force her father out into a dangerous storm, she locks the door behind him as well. Cornwall, and especially Regan, show no kindness to Lear throughout the entire story, even though he is Regans father and their former king. The drastic consequences of this lack of kindness towards Lear eventually cause the deaths of both Regan and her husband, as Cornwall is murdered in a duel by Lears friend and Regan is poisoned by her jealous sister Goneril. They would never have started fighting unless Lear had driven a wedge between them with the di vision of the kingdom. Goneril, Regans older sister, also shows no compassion for Lear. Gloucester, a friend of Lears, tells Regan that I would not see thy cruel nails pluck out Lears poor old eyes, nor thy fierce sister in his anointed flesh stick boarish fangs. (III, vii, ll. 55-57). Regans nails are described as cruel, and Gonerils boarish fangs depict her as a savage animal who shows mercy and kindness to no one, not even her own father. Regan and Goneril were each given half the kingdom by their father, and ruled over it for a short period of time; however, at the end of the play, Goneril poisons Regan and kills herself. This commentary by Shakespeare shows the audience that while cruelty and anger may initially get you farther than compassion, kindness will be better for everyone in the end. In addition to his daughters, Lears friends are among the other characters who demonstrate Shakespeares theme of compassion throughout the story. In Act 3, Scene 4, Lear, whose mind is quickly deteriorating, asks Kent, Wilt break my heart? Kent, who remained undyingly faithful to the aging king, replied with I had rather break my own. (III, iv, ll. 4-5). The dedication, loyalty and empathy towards Lear that Kent demonstrates through the entire play show the audience the strength of Kents love towards the king, even after the king banishes him early in the story. The adoration that Kent has for King Lear reveals his strength of character and loyalty to the king, as not many people could continue to love and help someone after they have been mistreated by that someone the way Kent was. Just a bit later in Act 3, Scene 4 during lines 23 to 27, Lear shows his own compassion for one of the first times in the play. Prithee, go in thyself. Seek thine own ease. This tempest will not give me leave to ponder on things that would hurt me more. But Ill go in. (To Fool) In, boy. Go first. You houseless poverty- nay, get thee in. Ill pray, and then Ill sleep. His telling the Fool to go in ahead of him and make himself comfortable shows how he is putting his dear servant before himself, even in the depths of his madness. His treating a servant better than himself, a former king, shows how much empathy Lear has gained throughout the story. Several scenes earlier in the story, Lear realizes how uninformed he was when he says Poor naked wretches, wheresoer you are, that bide the pelting of this pitiless storm, how shall your houseless heads and unfed sides, your loopd and windowd raggedness, defend you from seasons such as these? O, I have taen too little care of this! Take physic, pomp; expose thyself to feel what wretches feel, that thou mayst shake the superflux to them, and show the heavens more just. (3.2.65-71). Hes feeling for the first time what its like to struggle and be poor, and he wishes, now that he knows what the poorest people go through, that he had done something more about it while he was king. It took losing his power and his mind to make Lear realize that he could have done something to help these people, which is Shakespeares way of telling his audience that they should always try to better others lives, even if they dont fully understand what others are going through until they experience it themselves. The theme of Its important to show kindness to others, even in difficult times is heavily implied throughout Shakespeares King Lear, demonstrating why caring about other people is valuable. His quiet, loving daughter Cordelias love is explained by Kent after Lear banishes her, and Lear later apologizes to Cordelia, mending their relationship after a period of argument. His other daughters, Regan and Goneril, end up dead after they show no kindness to their father. Even Lears own compassion was demonstrated through his sympathy for the Fool in his wild madness. Kent, also, showed great kindness to Lear despite Lears hatred of him. Throughout the story, Shakespeare demonstrates that we should always try to be kind even when bad things may be happening in your life. After all, according to Albert Schweitzer, the meaning of life is to show compassion to others. Works Cited: Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Trans. John Crowther. Spark Publishing, 2003.

Environmental Policies Of China And Brazil - 1651 Words

China and Brazil have developed historically together but why does Brazil have more effective environmental agencies than the China? Both nations are different politically and cultural, however through their developments as nations their environmental policies are having different degrees of success. These countries are partly free, but Brazil has informal institutions including the Catholic Church that affects the political climate and has helped environmental agencies. China and Brazil have historically had similar environmental policy specifically in UN talks. These countries have had their own struggles with their environmental policy trying to have a balance of economic growth and being a sustainable country. It is important examine†¦show more content†¦As a communist state becoming more international acknowledged as a state China had to make major changes as a government and it had to come externally. China â€Å"began to manifest an awareness of environmental problem s in the early 1970’s† (Ross, 810). This was because China had gained a seat in the UN and was working with the U.S during this time. Right before the 1972 Stockholm conference China had created a domestic agency that worked with environmental issues so that they had a voice in the conference. This conference came to the existence of SEPA which had policies with emission permits that was modeled by economically advanced countries such as the U.S (Ross, 812). SEPA was a cost to the state and could restrain a growing economy which was not in China’s best interest. Right before the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development China and 41 other developing countries made a declaration. This declaration â€Å"acknowledged the need for international co-operation to promote environmental protection and sustainable development while demanding financial assistance† (Ross, 814). This was also mentioned by the top leaders of China that economic dev elopment would reject in any interference with domestic politics for environmental policy (Ross, 814). China eventually reached a deal with a 9 year plan which shows that China is not against environmental

armstrong Essay Example For Students

armstrong Essay Louis Armstrongs Influential CareerLouis Armstrong was the most successful and talented jazz musician in history. His influence and expansive career continues to make waves in the jazz world. That is what made him become what he is to many today a legend. Born on August 4, 1901, in the poorest section of New Orleans, Armstrong grew up with his grandparents due to his parents separation. On January 1, 1913 he made a mistake which turned out to be the best thing that ever happened to him. At a New Years celebration in downtown New Orleans, Louis Armstrong, also known as Satchmo and Satch, fired a pistol into the air and was placed in the Colored Waifs Home. It was there that he was introduced to Peter Davis the brass band leader who taught him how to play the cornet (Brown 17). Soon after he began playing, Armstrong was made leader of the band something he was extremely proud of. In June of 1914, Armstrong was free to leave the Waifs Home. He was hired by various cabarets throughout the city, as well as for picnics, dances, and funerals. It was at one of these places that he was spotted by the famous Joe King Oliver. King Oliver found Armstrong stand-in slots at orchestras and other venues. In 1918, he was offered the vacant seat left by Oliver in the band the Brown Skinned Babies. Kid Ory, leader of the band, once said that after Louis joined them he, improved so fast it was amazing. He had a wonderful ear and a wonderful memory. All you had to do was hum or whistle a new tune to him and hed know it right away (Boujut 21). At the end of 1918 Armstrong married Daisy Parker, a prostitute he had met at a dance hall that he played on Saturday nights. The marriage ended only four years later due to her beating him regularly (Bergreen 87). Louis Armstrong was hired in May of 1919 to play on a riverboat that traveled the Mississippi River from New Orleans to St. Louis. Armstrong soon became very popular in St. Louis and was in high demand (Collier 124). Two and a half years later, he was thrown off the riverboat and fired due to a fight. After returning to New Orleans, he received a telegram from King Oliver in Chicago. It was an invitation to join The Creole Jazz Band an offer Armstrong couldnt refuse. The Jazz Band cut its first record in the spring of 1923 and toured throughout Illinois, Ohio, and Indiana (Hadlock 64). A year later Armstrong married Lil Hardin, the pianist in the band. He soon grew tired of playing in Chicago and left Olivers band to head for New York City. When Armstrong reached the City and began playing everyone went wild. No where had they ever heard anything like him. Before this time, he had only played instruments but he was soon encouraged to begin singing. It was then discovered that Armstrong had a natural extension of his trumpet abilities, which was singing. His gravelly voice was something new that had never been heard (Sadie 600). Armstrong formed a studio band in 1925 called the Hot Five. The band included Johnny Dodds, Kid Ory, John St. Cyr, Lil Armstrong, and himself. These recordings were some of the most famous made by Armstrong, including Mandy Make Up Your Mind and Money Blues (Bergreen 96). A year later the Hot Five made their only public appearance at the Chicago Coliseum. The Chicago Defender spoke of Louis Armstrong, the miracle with steel lips, (Boujut 27). .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b , .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b .postImageUrl , .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b , .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b:hover , .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b:visited , .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b:active { border:0!important; } .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b:active , .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u022bc38815ea409eef0b5bcbbb1a9b4b:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Sugars Symphony Essay For the next few years Armstrong recorded with the Hot Five and played with other musicians in New York and Chicago. He then traveled to California, in July of 1930, where he starred in his first film, Flame. Only after he had been in California for a few weeks he was arrested at a nightclub for the possession of marijuana. The incident obviously caused a lot of controversy across the world. The sentence, six months in prison, was suspended after only three days. Mainly due to Armstrongs addiction to marijuana, Lil separated from him and they no longer worked together (Boujut 33). In 1932 the Hot Five split up. Armstrong remained in California and starred in Rhapsody in Black and Blue and You Rascal You. Later that year, he sailed to England where he played for the King (Crouch 171). An experience that ranked as one of the best times of my life, he stated (Bergreen 107). Something interesting happened to Armstrong in 1933. In Londons Daily Express the death of the trumpet player with lips of steel, was reported (Boujut 36). Five days later Melody Maker issued a correction but the news had already spread around the globe. In April of 1934 Armstrong began touring Europe. He visited various countries including France, Belgium, Switzerland, and the Netherlands where he was welcomed with open arms. The tour was scheduled to carry on to North Africa and Egypt, but the state of Armstrongs lips forced him to cancel his remaining shows and not play for over eight months (Brown 154). In 1935 Armstrong formed a commercial style big band with fifteen other musicians (Brown 76). For the next twelve years he starred in various films and played with his new band. It was in 1947 that he abandoned the big band and returned to small band format. He joined the All-Stars, made up of Jack Teagarden, George Wettling, Big Sid Catlett, Dick Cary, Peanuts Hucko, Bob Hagart. That turned out to be the group he worked with until his death. In the heat of the Civil Rights Movement, Louis Armstrong was called an Uncle Tom by blacks, referring to Harriet Beecher Stowes Uncle Toms Cabin. African-Americans blamed Armstrong for not using his fame to speak out against the unjust treatment of his race in the United States (Brown 92). They also said he was holding his race back because he didnt demand respect from whites and he smiled too much when he was in public (Crouch 171). In Armstrongs opinion he didnt understand what he was doing wrong. He had ignored prejudice because he had been taught to respect people unless they had personally disrespected him (Brown 92). It was in 1955 that Louis Armstrong was made Americas musical ambassador. He traveled throughout the world on the United States behalf and even made an album titled, Ambassador Satch. All over the world he was respected and welcomed to perform nearly anywhere he chose. Hello Dolly, Armstrongs most well known song was recorded in 1964. It hit number one on the Billboard charts on April 8th. It was accompanied by one of movies he starred in which shared the same title. For the next seven years of his life he was in and out of the hospital due to heart and kidney problems. On July 6th, 1971, Louis Armstrong died of a lung infection and heart complications. His last wish, that his trumpet be buried with him, was granted. Louis Armstrong influenced almost all aspects of jazz technique and style. He was the first to improvise and elaborate on a given melody. This technique has since been attempted and copied time and time again. Armstrong introduced a freedom to music that continues to impact popular music (Sadie 601). Without this American genius music would not be what it is today. .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922 , .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922 .postImageUrl , .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922 , .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922:hover , .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922:visited , .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922:active { border:0!important; } .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-co lor: #95A5A6; } .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922:active , .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative; } .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugin s/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left: 18px; top: 0; } .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922 .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf6ab79305a73e4d1757e4623a3d58922:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Explain How The Inherent Strength Of Prussia, Comb Essay

Wto Dispute Beef Hormone Case Essay Example

Wto Dispute Beef Hormone Case Essay The main problem in the dispute between the United States and the European Union in the beef hormone dispute is to determine the extent that a country can use health or other concerns to prohibit trade. The major aspect of this dilemma is that the United States and Europe have different regulations concerning beef. Although the beef meets American and International standards it doesn’t meet some European regulations. Even though the case went to the WTO and there were recommendations made, the have problem between the United States and the European Union has not been solved. In the case study it informs us that after the ruling in the favor of removing the barrier due to a lack of scientific evidence that hormone treated beef is bad, that the European Union persisted in the ban of all hormone treated beef (Moss 2002). In retaliation the United States placed tariffs on a mixture European Union goods; however, though the both the tariffs and beef restrictions remain, the parties are in negotiations (Moss 2002). Thus, there are a few different outcomes that may eventually take place, the ban on beef remains in place, the ban on beef is taken away in response to punitive tariffs, or the two parties come to an understanding and make compromises. Because the United States has performed decades of research, they feel that the hormone-treated beef is perfectly safe to the end consumers. Research has shown that the amount of hormones in the treated beef isn’t significantly above the hormone levels found in naturally raised beef (Moss 2002). We will write a custom essay sample on Wto Dispute Beef Hormone Case specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Wto Dispute Beef Hormone Case specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Wto Dispute Beef Hormone Case specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Thus, by taking the case to the WTO has tried to ensure that the European Union is not creating a non-tariff barrier to trade. Even though there are other tariffs placed on the European Union, they don’t seem to mind the higher costs. One measure the United States could take next is to increase the punitive tariffs higher until Europe drops its ban, thus, trying to force Europe into accepting its imports. While America could certainly push this prerogative, it is not likely to create an effective solution to the problem. It is clear that the United States and Europe have different tolerances when it comes to modified food and what they are willing to tolerate. Jean Buzby, an agricultural economist, states, â€Å"European consumers are generally less trusting of food safety regulatory systems than are U. S. consumers because of recent incidents where European agencies initially failed to detect the extent of food safety problems† (Buzby 64). Thus, it is clear to see why the European consumers are skeptical to allow the hormone-grown beef. This fear was magnified after the press sensationalized the possible effects of long-term the beef consumption (Moss 2002). However, insisting the ban remain in place or go away is short sided and not likely to alleviate the tension of the relationship between the United States farmers and the European Union consumers. Thus, both sides need to examine what an equitable remedy would be for the regulation and trade of the hormone grown beef. The two aspects that the case mentions have been discussed in negotiations is that the United States agreed to label the hormone-treated beef, and Europe has offered to expand the market for naturally grown American beef (Moss 2002). Both of these options are good first steps to be taken. By labeling the hormone-treated beef, the European consumer can make an informed decision, and allow the individual consumers to decide whether or not to buy meat that has been raised with hormones. However, this will add considerable cost to the marketing of the meat, and may not solve the real problem (Buzby 2001). In order to ensure that labels can be trusted and accurately reflect the true product, there need to be more means of controls and agents to inspect and certify the meat. As a result the price for the beef will increase to pay for the process and it may lead to problems in Europe as consumers shun the meat from the United States. The European agreement to create more access to the market for untreated meat is important because it is a step forward in allowing the import of American beef. If the United States had understood and taken into consideration the needs of all people affected by the problem, I think they would have come up with better solutions to the problem rather than going to the WTO. America would have seen that the context of the problem doesn’t end in the science of the problem, but it stems from prior food safety issues. References: Buzby, J. C. , Effects of food-safety perceptions on food demand and global trade, In: Regmi, A. 2001. Ed.. Changing Structure of Global Food Consumption and Trade, Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) EconomicResearch Service. 55–66. Moss, David, and Rick Bartlett, Note on WTO disputes: five major cases, 2002. Boston: Harvard College. 5-7. Wto Dispute Beef Hormone Case Essay Example Wto Dispute Beef Hormone Case Essay The main problem in the dispute between the United States and the European Union in the beef hormone dispute is to determine the extent that a country can use health or other concerns to prohibit trade. The major aspect of this dilemma is that the United States and Europe have different regulations concerning beef. Although the beef meets American and International standards it doesn’t meet some European regulations. Even though the case went to the WTO and there were recommendations made, the have problem between the United States and the European Union has not been solved. In the case study it informs us that after the ruling in the favor of removing the barrier due to a lack of scientific evidence that hormone treated beef is bad, that the European Union persisted in the ban of all hormone treated beef (Moss 2002). In retaliation the United States placed tariffs on a mixture European Union goods; however, though the both the tariffs and beef restrictions remain, the parties are in negotiations (Moss 2002). Thus, there are a few different outcomes that may eventually take place, the ban on beef remains in place, the ban on beef is taken away in response to punitive tariffs, or the two parties come to an understanding and make compromises. Because the United States has performed decades of research, they feel that the hormone-treated beef is perfectly safe to the end consumers. Research has shown that the amount of hormones in the treated beef isn’t significantly above the hormone levels found in naturally raised beef (Moss 2002). We will write a custom essay sample on Wto Dispute Beef Hormone Case specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Wto Dispute Beef Hormone Case specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Wto Dispute Beef Hormone Case specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Thus, by taking the case to the WTO has tried to ensure that the European Union is not creating a non-tariff barrier to trade. Even though there are other tariffs placed on the European Union, they don’t seem to mind the higher costs. One measure the United States could take next is to increase the punitive tariffs higher until Europe drops its ban, thus, trying to force Europe into accepting its imports. While America could certainly push this prerogative, it is not likely to create an effective solution to the problem. It is clear that the United States and Europe have different tolerances when it comes to modified food and what they are willing to tolerate. Jean Buzby, an agricultural economist, states, â€Å"European consumers are generally less trusting of food safety regulatory systems than are U. S. consumers because of recent incidents where European agencies initially failed to detect the extent of food safety problems† (Buzby 64). Thus, it is clear to see why the European consumers are skeptical to allow the hormone-grown beef. This fear was magnified after the press sensationalized the possible effects of long-term the beef consumption (Moss 2002). However, insisting the ban remain in place or go away is short sided and not likely to alleviate the tension of the relationship between the United States farmers and the European Union consumers. Thus, both sides need to examine what an equitable remedy would be for the regulation and trade of the hormone grown beef. The two aspects that the case mentions have been discussed in negotiations is that the United States agreed to label the hormone-treated beef, and Europe has offered to expand the market for naturally grown American beef (Moss 2002). Both of these options are good first steps to be taken. By labeling the hormone-treated beef, the European consumer can make an informed decision, and allow the individual consumers to decide whether or not to buy meat that has been raised with hormones. However, this will add considerable cost to the marketing of the meat, and may not solve the real problem (Buzby 2001). In order to ensure that labels can be trusted and accurately reflect the true product, there need to be more means of controls and agents to inspect and certify the meat. As a result the price for the beef will increase to pay for the process and it may lead to problems in Europe as consumers shun the meat from the United States. The European agreement to create more access to the market for untreated meat is important because it is a step forward in allowing the import of American beef. If the United States had understood and taken into consideration the needs of all people affected by the problem, I think they would have come up with better solutions to the problem rather than going to the WTO. America would have seen that the context of the problem doesn’t end in the science of the problem, but it stems from prior food safety issues. References: Buzby, J. C. , Effects of food-safety perceptions on food demand and global trade, In: Regmi, A. 2001. Ed.. Changing Structure of Global Food Consumption and Trade, Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) EconomicResearch Service. 55–66. Moss, David, and Rick Bartlett, Note on WTO disputes: five major cases, 2002. Boston: Harvard College. 5-7.